The Technical Security Layer
for EU AI Act Compliance

Compliance platforms document what you promise.
The Pitstop proves what you deliver.

-- Days
-- Hours
-- Minutes
-- Seconds

⚠️ August 2, 2026 — Enforcement Begins

High-risk AI systems operating in the EU must comply or face penalties up to €35 million or 7% of global revenue.

Scan Now — Free

🇪🇺 This Isn't Optional. This Is Law.

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — the EU AI Act — became enforceable on August 1, 2024.
Companies have until August 2, 2026 to ensure high-risk AI systems comply.

📅 August 2, 2026

High-risk AI systems must comply with Articles 9-15 (risk management, data governance, logging, transparency, human oversight, security).

💰 Up to €35M or 7%

Penalties can reach €35 million OR 7% of global annual revenue (whichever is higher) for non-compliance.

🌍 Any EU Customer = In Scope

If your AI systems serve EU customers, you're subject to the AI Act — regardless of where your company is headquartered.

Article 99 — Penalties: "Non-compliance with the prohibition of the artificial intelligence practices referred to in Article 5 shall be subject to administrative fines of up to EUR 35 000 000 or, if the offender is an undertaking, up to 7 % of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher."

How We Fit Your Compliance Stack

We're not a compliance platform. We're the technical security layer that makes compliance platforms credible.

📋

Governance Platform

OneTrust, SECJUR, Credo AI

  • Documentation & process
  • Policy templates
  • Workflow management
  • Audit trails
🔧

The Pitstop

Technical Security Evidence

  • Agent-specific security scanning
  • Runtime risk assessment
  • 27 technical checks (Articles 9-15)
  • Continuous monitoring
⚖️

Legal Counsel

Regulatory Interpretation

  • Legal risk assessment
  • Regulatory strategy
  • Conformity assessment prep
  • Incident response

Together = Complete Compliance

Your governance platform says "we promise to be compliant."
The Pitstop says "here's the technical proof."

Why You Need Both: Governance platforms are excellent at documentation, workflows, and policy management. But they can't test if your AI agent actually follows those policies. That's where we come in — we're the technical validation layer that proves your controls work.

What We Are (and What We're Not)

Honest positioning — we do one thing exceptionally well.

✓ We ARE:

  • Agent-specific security scanning — 27 checks purpose-built for AI agents (not generic AI systems)
  • Technical evidence for audits — Real, measurable security data you can show regulators
  • Runtime risk assessment — Continuous monitoring of agent behavior in production
  • EU AI Act Article mapping — Direct citations to Articles 9-15 technical requirements
  • Complement to compliance platforms — We integrate with OneTrust, SECJUR, Credo AI

✗ We're NOT:

  • Legal advice — We provide technical data, not regulatory interpretation. Consult legal counsel.
  • Full documentation generation — We don't replace your governance platform's policy templates
  • A conformity assessment body — We're a technical scanning tool, not a certification authority
  • A complete compliance solution — Compliance requires governance + technical security + legal strategy
  • Generic AI security — We're laser-focused on AI agents (not ML models, chatbots, or general AI)
The Bottom Line: If your compliance platform is the "promise," we're the "proof." If governance platforms are the steering wheel, we're the speedometer and airbags. You need both to be compliant.

Works With Your Existing Stack

We complement (not compete with) leading compliance platforms.

OneTrust

GRC & Privacy Management

SECJUR

EU AI Act Compliance Platform

Credo AI

AI Governance & Risk

TrustArc

Privacy & Compliance Automation

Integration via API, CSV export, or manual report upload. Contact us for enterprise integrations.

How The Pitstop Maps to EU AI Act Articles 9-15

Our scanner's 27 security checks provide direct technical evidence for the most critical requirements.

Article 9 Risk Management

Continuous risk identification, mitigation, and monitoring throughout the AI system lifecycle.

tool_restrictions — Limits agent capabilities
plugin_allowlist — Controls external tools
subagent_sandboxing — Prevents cascading risk
trust_scoring — Real-time risk assessment
delegation_limits — Caps autonomous chains
anomaly_detection — Identifies deviations
monitoring_alerts — Real-time notifications
7 checks — 26% coverage

Article 10 Data Governance

Quality criteria for training, validation, and operational data to ensure safe performance.

sensitive_data_masking — Protects PII, payment data, health records
clipboard_restrictions — Prevents data exfiltration
2 checks — 7% coverage

Article 12 Record-Keeping

Automatic logging of events relevant to risk identification and regulatory audits.

command_logging — Records every exec command
session_recording — Full session transcripts
audit_trail — Immutable timestamped logs
3 checks — 11% coverage

Article 13 Transparency

Transparent operation enabling deployers to interpret outputs and use appropriately.

output_filtering — Reviews outputs before delivery
1 check — 4% coverage

Article 14 Human Oversight

Effective human oversight capabilities including intervention and decision override.

instruction_hierarchy — Humans override agents
behavioral_inheritance — Oversight rules cascade
delegation_limits — Prevents runaway autonomy
subagent_output_review — Human review gates
4 checks — 15% coverage

Article 15 Security & Robustness

Appropriate levels of accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity throughout the lifecycle.

exec_security_mode — Restricts shell execution
sandbox_enabled — System isolation
file_system_permissions — Limits file access
network_access_control — Blocks unauthorized connections
system_prompt_protection — Prevents prompt injection
input_validation — Ensures data integrity
outbound_allowlist — Whitelist-based networking
ssrf_protection — Prevents SSRF attacks
skill_verification — Tamper-proof skills
dependency_pinning — Supply chain security
package_audit — CVE scanning
11 checks — 41% coverage 🏆

The State of AI Agent Compliance

We scanned 101 AI agents in March 2026. Here's what we found.

18% Average Compliance Score
0/101 Agents with Full Logging
94% Missing Human Oversight
3 Months Until Deadline

Most Common Compliance Gaps

Article 12: Record-Keeping 100% non-compliant
100%
Article 14: Human Oversight 94% non-compliant
94%
Article 15: Cybersecurity 87% non-compliant
87%
Article 9: Risk Management 76% non-compliant
76%
Why Generic Security Isn't Enough: OpenAI's "Safety by Design" covers ~40% of Article 15. Anthropic's "Constitutional AI" addresses ~30% of Article 13. Google's "Responsible AI Practices" touch ~25% of Article 9. The Pitstop is the only scanner mapping all 27 checks specifically for AI agents across Articles 9-15.

Technical Security Plans

From free scans to continuous security monitoring — choose what fits your needs.

Free Scan

$0

27 security checks, instant results, technical gap analysis.

  • All 27 security checks
  • Instant scan results
  • Technical gap identification
  • Article mapping overview
  • PDF export
Scan Now — Free

Continuous Monitoring

$299/month

Ongoing technical security monitoring with weekly scans and drift detection.

  • Weekly automated scans
  • Security drift detection alerts
  • Technical security dashboard
  • Quarterly technical evidence certificate
  • Priority email support
  • API access
Contact Sales

Enterprise

Custom

For companies with 10+ agents or custom security requirements.

  • Dedicated security engineer
  • Custom check development
  • Integration with compliance platforms
  • White-label reports
  • On-site training
  • SLA guarantees
Contact Sales

Built by Security Practitioners

8 Patents Pending (Agent Security)
101 Agents Scanned (Beta)
27 Agent-Specific Checks
NIST AI RMF Aligned

Aligned with:

NIST AI RMF ISO 42001 EU AI Act Articles 9-15

Frequently Asked Questions

How does The Pitstop work with my existing compliance platform?

We complement governance platforms like OneTrust, SECJUR, and Credo AI by providing the technical security evidence they lack. Your compliance platform documents your policies and processes — we prove those controls actually work in your AI agents. Export our reports as technical appendices to your compliance documentation, or integrate via API for automated evidence collection.

Does this apply to my company?

If you deploy AI systems (including AI agents) that serve EU customers and are classified as "high-risk" under Article 6 of the EU AI Act, yes. High-risk typically includes AI that makes autonomous decisions affecting employment, essential services, fundamental rights, or processes sensitive data. Most production AI agents with exec permissions, file access, or data handling fall into this category.

What happens if I'm not compliant by August 2, 2026?

Non-compliance can result in fines up to €35 million or 7% of global annual revenue (whichever is higher), market bans (your AI systems can be ordered offline), and reputational damage from public disclosure. Regulators can also request technical audit logs — if you don't have them, that's automatic non-compliance.

Do you provide legal advice or compliance certification?

No. We're a technical security scanning tool. We provide measurable technical evidence for Articles 9-15 requirements, but we are not a law firm, conformity assessment body, or full compliance solution. You should consult qualified legal counsel for regulatory interpretation and compliance strategy. Think of us as "the technical engine" under your compliance platform's hood.

Is the free scan enough for compliance?

The free scan identifies technical security gaps and shows where you stand. For full compliance, you'll need: (1) Governance platform (policy documentation), (2) Our technical evidence (security scanning), (3) Legal counsel (regulatory strategy), (4) LLM provider certificates (Article 10), (5) HITL approval workflows (Article 14). We recommend the $499 Technical Evidence Report for audit-ready documentation.

What's the difference between the scan and the technical evidence report?

Free Scan: Shows your security score and technical gaps across 27 checks. Technical Evidence Report ($499): Adds article-by-article technical citations, remediation priority matrix, technical appendix format for compliance platforms, and audit-ready PDF. The report is what you attach to your governance platform's compliance package and show regulators.

⚠️ Important Disclaimer: The Pitstop provides technical security assessment tools and informational reports, not legal advice or compliance certification. Our scans, scores, and reports do not guarantee compliance with the EU AI Act or any other regulation. A passing score does not mean your system is secure or compliant. You should consult qualified legal counsel before making compliance decisions. See our Terms of Service for full details including limitation of liability.